Wednesday, August 06, 2014
The Deaths Of Scientists.
Tuesday, August 05, 2014
RICO SORDA: JERSEY CYBER STALKER - PART 2 OUR STORY - GUEST PO...
RICO SORDA: JERSEY CYBER STALKER - PART 2 OUR STORY - GUEST PO...: " CYBER STALKING 2" "A GUEST POSTING" "JON S HAWORTH" "THE S...
BBC. Denning Admits 29 Charges Of Child Abuse.
Baljit Ubhey, Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS London, said: "We have carefully considered the evidence gathered by the Metropolitan Police Service as part of Operation Yewtree in relation to Christopher Denning, who was initially arrested on 3 June 2013 over allegations of sexual offences. A full file of evidence was passed to the CPS on 6 March 2014.
"Having completed our review, we have concluded that there is sufficient evidence and it is in the public interest for Mr Denning to be charged with 41 offences, including 34 counts of indecent assault. These date from between 1967 and 1985, and relate to 22 male complainants aged between nine and 16 at the time of the alleged offending."
The charges are:
Two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 12-14 between 1967-70
One offence of indecency with a child and one offence of indecent assault on a boy aged 9-11 between 1969-71
One offence of indecent assault on a boy aged 14-16 between 1971-73
Two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 14-15 in 1973
One offence of indecent assault on a boy and one offence of buggery on a boy aged 13-14 between 1973-75
One offence of indecency with a child and two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 12-14 between 1976-77
One offence of indecent assault on a boy aged 14 between 1978-79
One offence of indecent assault on a boy aged 14 between 1978-79
One offence of buggery and two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 14-15 between 1978-79
One offence of indecent assault on a boy aged 12 between 1978-79
Two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 13-15 between 1978-80
Two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 12 between 1979-80
One offence of indecency with child on a boy aged 12-14 between 1981-82
Two offences of indecent assault and one offence of attempted buggery on a boy aged 10-13 between 1980-83
Two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 10-13 between 1980-83
One offence of indecent assault on a boy aged 12 between 1982-83
Two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 13-14 between 1982-83
One offence of indecent assault on a boy aged 14 in 1983
One offence of indecent assault and one offence of indecency with a child on a boy aged 11-12 in 1982
Three offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 12-14 between 1983-84
Two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 12-13 between 1983-84
Two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 16 between 1984-85
Ms Ubhey said: "The decision to prosecute has been taken in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors and Crown Prosecution Service legal guidance on rape and child sexual abuse. We have determined that there is sufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction and that a prosecution is in the public interest.
One offence of indecency with a child and one offence of indecent assault on a boy aged 9-11 between 1969-71
One offence of indecent assault on a boy aged 14-16 between 1971-73
Two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 14-15 in 1973
One offence of indecent assault on a boy and one offence of buggery on a boy aged 13-14 between 1973-75
One offence of indecency with a child and two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 12-14 between 1976-77
One offence of indecent assault on a boy aged 14 between 1978-79
One offence of indecent assault on a boy aged 14 between 1978-79
One offence of buggery and two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 14-15 between 1978-79
One offence of indecent assault on a boy aged 12 between 1978-79
Two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 13-15 between 1978-80
Two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 12 between 1979-80
One offence of indecency with child on a boy aged 12-14 between 1981-82
Two offences of indecent assault and one offence of attempted buggery on a boy aged 10-13 between 1980-83
Two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 10-13 between 1980-83
One offence of indecent assault on a boy aged 12 between 1982-83
Two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 13-14 between 1982-83
One offence of indecent assault on a boy aged 14 in 1983
One offence of indecent assault and one offence of indecency with a child on a boy aged 11-12 in 1982
Three offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 12-14 between 1983-84
Two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 12-13 between 1983-84
Two offences of indecent assault on a boy aged 16 between 1984-85
Ms Ubhey said: "The decision to prosecute has been taken in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors and Crown Prosecution Service legal guidance on rape and child sexual abuse. We have determined that there is sufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction and that a prosecution is in the public interest.
"We have also decided that no further action should be taken in relation to three further allegations against Mr Denning, made by three further complainants, as we determined that there was insufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction.
"May I remind all concerned that Mr Denning has a right to a fair trial. It is extremely important that there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings."
Anyone would think you HAD to be an abuser to work at the BBC back then.
Is it still going on today?
Is it still going on today?
Denning pleaded guilty to 29 historic abuse charges.
Monday, August 04, 2014
Sunday, August 03, 2014
Open letter to Margaret Hodge MP from Dr Liz Davies.
Open letter to Margaret Hodge MP from Dr Liz Davies
Dear Margaret Hodge,
You rightly say that, whistleblowing is ‘crucial’ and has to matter ‘right to the top of an organisation’. Your perspective has certainly changed since the time when, as leader of Islington Council, you so seriously hindered my investigation of crimes against children. As the main ‘whistleblower’ I have been struggling since the 90s to put the record straight about the murders, sexual exploitation, neglect and physical torture of children both within the care of Islington social services and in the local community. I have also tried to expose the connections between Islington networks and those in other parts of the country.
We have all learnt a lot in the last 20 years and I am continually discovering more about what actually happened during those years when, as a social worker, I was working to protect vulnerable Islington children. It would seem now, in the context of your statements on whistleblowing and your support of the National Inquiry into Organised Abuse of Children, that it is certainly appropriate to move forward in order to increase all our understanding about what led to the cover up of organised child abuse in the Borough.
A few years ago, as more information came to light, you apologised for your mistakes and provided the explanation for your actions that you were misled by senior officers. However, I now question why you did not give evidence to this effect to the final Islington Inquiry in 1995. Also, you have not said if you referred these managers to the police and to the appropriate regulatory body in order to prevent them working with children. So many of them, whose names I remember clearly, have progressed in their social work careers without ever having been accountable for their actions or inactions.
Most puzzling is my discovery of how much was previously known about child abuse in Islington since the early 80s and I, of course, realise that you were council leader from 1982. Am I to believe that you really did not know that there had been a long established pattern of sexual exploitation and even the alleged murders of children within Islington’s care? These events were well covered in the local and national media and, in this context, I cannot understand why my disclosures just a few years later were met with such disbelief. Geoffrey Dickens MP, for instance, exposed the sexual exploitation of Islington children. This was just four years before I raised similar concerns about children’s safety in the neighbourhood of Islington where I worked and for which you were the local councillor. This area was just a few streets away from the location that he was including in one of his now famous dossiers. I have to question why I was not informed at the time about these very serious cases. All this prior intelligence would have validated some of my enquiries and greatly assisted my investigations. If I had received support and understanding from you, I would have been far better able to protect the children who were so severely harmed. Instead, every obstacle was put in my way. My only professionally ethical option at the time was to work covertly with police. When our work achieved a major conviction I thought I would be believed but instead I was further silenced by managers. I now question if you were informed about this conviction and the circumstances in which young people were disclosing? I wonder if you were also informed about all the professionals working alongside me in the investigations and how many were told by their agency representatives on the Area Child Protection Committee that there was no evidence.
What exactly did influence your decision-making at the time? What led you to take a stand, for instance, in publicly blaming a brave whistleblowing residential worker? After raising the alarm about child sex abusers accessing children as young as 9 years old in a children’s home, he was dismissed and prevented from working with children for many years. What led you to dismiss my substantial report about a local network of sexual exploitation? Your support from ‘the top’ of the organisation might have been able to reverse the path of history and protect so many children. I am now being contacted by survivors who feel more able to come forward in the current climate. It is deeply worrying that so many of their files are missing. When I attended the Inquiries not a single one of my records was to be found. What is your understanding now of such negligence?
There are so many questions I would like to ask you. Did you know that after presenting 4 hours of evidence to one Islington Inquiry none of my information was included in the report? Did you know that one of the people who was the subject of one of the 14 Islington Inquiry reports returned to Children’s services in recent years and had not been barred from work with children? I do not know the 32 names listed by Ian White, in the Appendix to his final report, of professionals deemed unsuitable to work with children. I do know two social workers who should never have been named on the list as they were whistleblowers. In the light of your recent comment that some whistleblowers are treated badly I would expect that you would agree that the list of 32 needs to be urgently reviewed.
The White Report in 1995 (Report of the Inquiry into the Management of Child Care in the London Borough of Islington) made reference to 61 children I had identified as possible victims of an organised abuse network. It went on to conclude that, ‘while some individual children were at risk of abuse, the Police found no evidence of connections between these such as would support the assertion that there was organised abuse’ (p. 42). I would like to know in the light of current knowledge, and with hindsight, what your opinion is of this finding.
You say that there should be sanctions for those who victimise whistleblowers. The Islington Inquiries were not a legal process and no-one was required to give evidence. Do you think, therefore, that it is too late to call to account those who obstructed my investigations and those who misled you? Other authorities are now interviewing former whistleblowers and considering what action can be taken to right the wrongs of the past. I have not been asked by Islington authorities to assist in identifying perpetrators or to help survivors in understanding what happened to them.
As one example, I recently learnt from the media about the unnamed Islington children’s home supposedly related to Savile – no-one has asked me if I know which home it might be. I remain a registered social worker and am therefore appropriately qualified to professionally assist with child protection investigations and I would readily contribute my knowledge about networks of abuse in the area.
I am pleased that you are now supporting whistleblowers. I am one of them and I now ask for your full support in helping to unravel what really did happen in Islington about which you must surely know so much. It is a story which includes your story which has never been told. Many politicians are now bravely coming forward to speak out about organised child abuse – it is surely your time to contribute your account of what really happened.
Yours sincerely
Dr Liz Davies
Yours sincerely
Dr Liz Davies
#FreeMelanieShaw
#Help4thevictims
#amnesty4whistleblowers
#Help4thevictims
#amnesty4whistleblowers
Letter To Theresa May.
Britain's home minister Theresa May meanwhile has announced an independent inquiry to look into how the state and other institutions have handled accusations of abuse over the past four decades.
May told the parliament "that in the 1980s the Home Office failed to act on allegations of child sex abuse. Public bodies and other important institutions have also failed to take seriously their duty of care towards children. We will do everything we can to allow the full investigation of child abuse and the prosecution of its perpetrators and we will do nothing to jeopardise those aims. We will make sure that wherever individuals and institutions have failed to protect children from harm, we will expose these failures and learn the lessons".
May added "Some of these cases have exposed a failure by public bodies to take their duty of care seriously and some have shown that the organisations responsible for protecting children from abuse - including the police, social services and schools - have failed to work together properly".
May on Tuesday appointed Peter Wanless - the chief executive of the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children to lead a review about how the police and prosecutors handled any related information that was handed to them.
May also told the House that "the government will establish an independent inquiry panel of experts in the law and child protection to consider whether public bodies - and other non-state institutions - have taken seriously their duty of care to protect children from sexual abuse".
We are still waiting #HomeSecretary
Why the delay ?
#Getyourfingerout
Why the delay ?
#Getyourfingerout
Israel Lied About Hadar Goldin The Soldier Missing In Action.
Sunday morning August 3rd.
Hadar Goldin is dead, Israel have admitted this morning.
His 'capture' by Hamas was used by Israel as an excuse to break the 72 hour ceasefire.
His 'capture' by Hamas was used by Israel as an excuse to break the 72 hour ceasefire.
It is now reported that Hadar Goldin was killed, along with his two comrades, by Israeli 'friendly fire'.
America and the UN were tricked into condemning Hamas to ensure continued military aid for Israel.
Israel broke the ceasefire and lied to the world, including their own citizens.
Sanctions should now be imposed on Israel and every effort made by politicians to stop the massacre of the Palestinians.
Impose sanctions now.
#InterviewPalestinians
#InterviewPalestinians
#Stoptheviolence
Saturday, August 02, 2014
Fighting for Justice: Brian Pead arrested - AGAIN!
Fighting for Justice: Brian Pead arrested - AGAIN!: Unlawful arrest of Brian Pead Friday, 15 March 2013. Southend Police Station, Essex Time: 20:35 Arresting Officer: APS Harper [71035] Reason...
Remove corruption from the Courts and the Police: THE TRUTH ABOUT BRIAN PEAD - PART ONE
Remove corruption from the Courts and the Police: THE TRUTH ABOUT BRIAN PEAD - PART ONE: Framed! anatomy of police persecution by Richard Fulcher , Michael Bird , Geoffrey Bacon and William Freeman ...
#Amnesty4whistleblowers
#Amnesty4whistleblowers
#InterviewPalestinians
Why are the BBC not interviewing Palestinians ?
The massacre in #Gaza is one sided.
As well as our media reports.
#InterviewPalestinians
The massacre in #Gaza is one sided.
As well as our media reports.
#InterviewPalestinians
That Word #Freemasons Keeps Cropping Up.
Who are the Freemasons in Government and the Civil Service ?
How many in the Secret Services ?
#Amnesty4whistlebowers
Petition. Remove All D Notices RelatingTo Child Sex Abuse
https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/remove-all-d-notices-or-restrictions-to-fully-expose-child-abuse-offenders?source=twitter-share-button
A petition to remove all D notices relating to the Child Sex Abuse inquiry.
Please sign.
Please sign.
#Help4thevictims
Amnesty4whistleblowers
Amnesty4whistleblowers
Let the truth out.
If Hamas Wasn't Firing Rockets Into Israel ?
Then there would be no need for the war would there ?
#GazaUnderAttack
#GazaUnderAttack
Would there ?
Friday, August 01, 2014
The Zionist Project. Comparing Israel And Canada's Attempted Genocide.
The Zionist Project is to eradicate all Palestinians who make claim to a home in Palestine. The Zionist Project is exactly what Israel has been doing since its artificial creation.
The Zionist Project is planned incremental dispossession and an on-going attempted genocide, and this has been repeatedly and explicitly expressed by its architects and executioners. The Zionist Project as attempted genocide is also expressly cheered-on by many Israeli citizens and by members of the Zionist diaspora of all religions.
The Israeli apartheid is not meant as a sustained apartheid. It is an increment in an attempted genocide that accompanies a vast racist pillaging of land and resources (water, gas).
The Israeli apartheid is not meant as a sustained apartheid. It is an increment in an attempted genocide that accompanies a vast racist pillaging of land and resources (water, gas).
The attempted Israeli genocide, in its on-going mid-phase, is not unlike the now-accomplished Canadian genocide against First Peoples. First there were population displacements, then exterminations, then land treaties, then reservations, then forced cultural assimilation for any survivors, then cultural normalization of the crimes, and never any possibility of return or reparations.
A main difference is that Canada’s genocide is virtually complete, whereas Israel’s attempted genocide is in full swing and unfolding militarily before the world, in a time of instant and distributed electronic publishing, and in a time when other genocides have been named, exposed, condemned, and studied and understood. [1]
Another difference is that Canadian politicians are — these days, in the end-game of the Canadian genocide — lying cover-up artists, whereas Israeli politicians are straight-up, and are supported by an overtly and enthusiastically racist population.
Another difference is that Canadian politicians are — these days, in the end-game of the Canadian genocide — lying cover-up artists, whereas Israeli politicians are straight-up, and are supported by an overtly and enthusiastically racist population.
By comparison, Canadian citizens are racist in condoning their state’s violence (both domestic and international) but they practice language-cleansing to hide their true racism from themselves. (There is even a pseudo-intellectual legalistic framework to help accomplish this known as “critical race theory” [2] — The aftermath of a genocide is always a bit tricky, with wanting a “safe” mental-environment for the children and all, and for the professionals that continue to advance and maintain the exploitative system.)
Yet another difference is that Israel was created and is supported by the super-genocidal states (USA, Britain, et al.) in order to prevent and police-against any unified emergence of the Muslim World in the resource-rich and geopolitically central Middle East. Then again, Canada was entirely supported by Britain during the most brutal period of its genocide, and this was in-part to counter USA emergence and domination on the North American continent.
An analysis of Israel’s on-going attempted genocide is informed by the social history of Canada’s genocide, and this model should be predictive.
If Israel’s attempted genocide is allowed to ripen to completion, then Israeli’s will cleanse their history and their language and thoughts, in the post-genocide period. We must not get there. The overt racism-of-expression of Israeli society and of the Zionist diaspora is an unmistakable indicator that the attempted genocide is in mid-project, as was the case in Canada during the overtly racist campaigns to take the territory.
If Israel’s attempted genocide is allowed to ripen to completion, then Israeli’s will cleanse their history and their language and thoughts, in the post-genocide period. We must not get there. The overt racism-of-expression of Israeli society and of the Zionist diaspora is an unmistakable indicator that the attempted genocide is in mid-project, as was the case in Canada during the overtly racist campaigns to take the territory.
Language and silence are both indicators of intention, but racist language is not the cause of the genocidal thrust. The cause is a lust for power and resources actuated by global and regional dominance hierarchies that are very real entities in themselves: The top layer probably being the global exploitation project of the American Empire, driven by its military economy and its control of global economic instruments.
I personally do not believe that Israel is the tail that wags the USA dog, but there is certainly a large degree of that going on [3][4]. The Zionist diaspora derives power and influence from supporting the Zionist Project, from its support for Israel’s genocide [4].
The Zionist Project must now be stopped. This genocide must be stopped in its tracks, if it’s the last significant geopolitical accomplishment of the global civil society. The tide is turning. We see real political movement in the UK itself. Western World civil society must not be irrelevant and ineffective. We owe that to ourselves.
The only effective barrier against the Zionist Project at the moment is the remarkable Palestinian resistance itself. And Israel is doing everything it can to isolate, divide, erode, and destroy that resistance. The Palestinian resistance is phenomenal. Against all odds, Palestine has repeatedly found ways to assert itself, despite the tremendous pressures to make it abandon.
The only effective barrier against the Zionist Project at the moment is the remarkable Palestinian resistance itself. And Israel is doing everything it can to isolate, divide, erode, and destroy that resistance. The Palestinian resistance is phenomenal. Against all odds, Palestine has repeatedly found ways to assert itself, despite the tremendous pressures to make it abandon.
The World civil society must actuate arguably-the-first stoppage of a nation-scale genocide pursued by a colonial invader.
There can be peace and coexistence but Israel is hell-bent on its Zionist Project, and those Muslim countries with corrupt leaders are participating in the Israeli genocide rather than impeding it. Therefore, the only chance for Palestinian survival, at this time, is increased armed Palestinian resistance. And that is something Western civil society had better understand before it’s too late, if it wants to be part of the solution rather than part of the problem [5].
There can be peace and coexistence but Israel is hell-bent on its Zionist Project, and those Muslim countries with corrupt leaders are participating in the Israeli genocide rather than impeding it. Therefore, the only chance for Palestinian survival, at this time, is increased armed Palestinian resistance. And that is something Western civil society had better understand before it’s too late, if it wants to be part of the solution rather than part of the problem [5].
If Israel cannot be discouraged, and since it cannot be disarmed, then Palestine must be armed sufficiently to effectively discourage the on-going Israeli genocide. Can Israel be discouraged from pursuing its vicious plan? It’s time to test that question, while supporting that Palestine be enabled to defend itself.
Israel must live and thrive without Zionism and thus without its apartheid/genocide project, and Judaism must thrive in Israel and in the World, but the Zionist project must die. Until that can be feasible, Israel must be ostracized, isolated, boycotted, and shunned. World civil society can achieve this if it gets serious and starts by rejecting the Zionist diaspora wherever it acts. Jews that abandon and reject the
In Canada, Stephen Harper is the “Prime Minister of Canada for Israel”. Israel’s regional violence keeps the price of oil high and the tar sands exploitable and profitable to the US masters of the Canadian economy.
The Canadian Israel lobby is an arm of US imperialism and has taken over as arguably the most influential superstructure acting on Canadian politics. Trudeau [6] and Mulcair are vying to be more Zionist than Harper. It’s disgusting and humiliating for Canadians.
Virtually no Canadian members of parliament have condemned Israel for its grotesque massacre. Those who speak out condone and normalize the genocide. The Canadian mainstream media is largely poisoned by the same Zionism [7].
In Canada’s capital Ottawa, the university presidents of the two largest universities in the city are both staunch Zionists that make artificial academic ties with Israel and suppress student movements for justice for Palestinians.
This has all gone too far. It’s time to roll back Zionism in Canada and everywhere. Palestinians are doing the remarkable. The least we can do for ourselves is to cut back Zionists in our own countries.
Endnotes
[1] “A Little Matter of Genocide – Holocaust and Denial in the Americas 1492 to the Present” by Ward Churchill, City Lights Books, San Francisco, 1997.
[2] “Hierarchy and Free Expression in the Fight Against Racism” by Denis G. Rancourt, Stairway Press, Mount Vernon, WA, 2013.
[3] “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy” by Mearsheimer, John J. and Walt, Stephen; New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007.
[4] “The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering” by Norman G. Finkelstein, Verso, NY, 2000.
[5] “Rockets from Gaza are morally justified and are not contrary to international law” by Denis G. Rancourt, Activist Teacher blog, July 24, 2014.
[6] “Justin Trudeau: ‘We have Israel’s back’“, Carey Miller YouTube Channel, published April 6, 2014.
[7] “CBC-Ottawa’s biased reporting of a pro-Palestine rally — Not good” by Denis G. Rancourt, Activist Teacher blog, July 27, 2014.
[1] “A Little Matter of Genocide – Holocaust and Denial in the Americas 1492 to the Present” by Ward Churchill, City Lights Books, San Francisco, 1997.
[2] “Hierarchy and Free Expression in the Fight Against Racism” by Denis G. Rancourt, Stairway Press, Mount Vernon, WA, 2013.
[3] “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy” by Mearsheimer, John J. and Walt, Stephen; New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007.
[4] “The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering” by Norman G. Finkelstein, Verso, NY, 2000.
[5] “Rockets from Gaza are morally justified and are not contrary to international law” by Denis G. Rancourt, Activist Teacher blog, July 24, 2014.
[6] “Justin Trudeau: ‘We have Israel’s back’“, Carey Miller YouTube Channel, published April 6, 2014.
[7] “CBC-Ottawa’s biased reporting of a pro-Palestine rally — Not good” by Denis G. Rancourt, Activist Teacher blog, July 27, 2014.
A Smaller, Different Way Of Protesting.
The arrest of blogger chris spivey has made me think.
I followed news via his friends updates on twitter and facebook.
They bombared the essex police station with calls asking for information.
I followed news via his friends updates on twitter and facebook.
They bombared the essex police station with calls asking for information.
When i was young(er) we would have organised a vigil outside the station.
As large a presence as could be mustered to publicise, agitate and inform.
Three people becomes five then eight very quickly.
As large a presence as could be mustered to publicise, agitate and inform.
Three people becomes five then eight very quickly.
It was the same with any problems with local and county councils.
Down to the offices with quickly prepared leaflets explaining and discussing the issues.
We always tried to involve the local trade unionists and newspapers.
Down to the offices with quickly prepared leaflets explaining and discussing the issues.
We always tried to involve the local trade unionists and newspapers.
We even visited council executives and councillors homes.
A peaceful yet noisy, in your face protest.
Clear issues, clear demands with humour never anger.
A peaceful yet noisy, in your face protest.
Clear issues, clear demands with humour never anger.
We were always a small group but we got the message across.
Things happened things changed.
Things happened things changed.
With the mobile communications of today organising flash mobs quickly should be easy.
A few concerned people in every village, town and city getting in people faces, putting over the message.
Then melting away to plan for the next day of action.
A few concerned people in every village, town and city getting in people faces, putting over the message.
Then melting away to plan for the next day of action.
Protest Agitate Inform.
We dont need to be political.
We just need to care.
Things can change - if we get off our knees.
We just need to care.
Things can change - if we get off our knees.
The Who asked to co-produce 1960s TV show
The Who asked to co-produce 1960s TV show: The Who stars Roger Daltrey and Pete Townshend are in talks to co-produce a TV series about the London music scene in the 1960s.
When is the book coming out pete ?
#CSAinquiry
When is the book coming out pete ?
#CSAinquiry
LocalOrg: Decentralize Big-Retail
LocalOrg: Decentralize Big-Retail: How to Uproot Walmart & Bring Jobs Back Home. December 11, 2012 (LocalOrg) - In many towns across America, Walmart, or a similar ...
My Prime Minister David Cameron...
Is a staunch supporter of Israel's actions.
#NotInMyName prime minister
These are #WarCrimes and I am ashamed of you and my government supporting Israel.
Thursday, July 31, 2014
DWP Plan Universal Credit Changes Next Election.
#Kickoutthetories
A Labour MP has claimed that the government is "keeping under wraps" plans to make people who lose their jobs wait five weeks before they get any benefit payment under universal credit.
Michael Meacher, MP for Oldham West and Royton, says the plans are being kept secret by the government in the run up to the next general election but they are "hidden in the small print" of the rules for the controversial new benefit system.
Mr Meacher says the impact of a five-week wait will be "devastating" for anyone who loses their job as they will be unable to get help to cover rent, mortgage, food or fuel bills.
He said: "The five-week wait will apply to anyone making a new claim, however long they have held their job or however much national insurance they have paid in during their working life.
"The plans are hidden in the small print of the rules for the new universal credit system which Ian Duncan Smith (IDS) likes to parade as the government’s flagship benefit reform."
He added: "The programme has already been dogged by repeated delays and wasted at least £130 million through disastrous IT contracts. The five-week wait will hit millions of people.
"Since the economic crash in 2008-9, there have been 22 million new claimants for jobseeker’s allowance (JSA). In future everyone in this situation will have to wait five weeks for their first payment."
Under current rules, new claimants wait just over two weeks for their first payment but under DWP plans this will no longer happen.
He explains: "DWP plans now mean people will not be eligible for any benefits for the first week of unemployment and in total will have to wait at least five weeks before they get any money. The vast majority won’t even get limited emergency advanced payments.
"Benefit delays are one of the top three reasons people give for going to food banks. Even the government admits that the five-week wait will force more people to go into debt."
He added: "The only ones to gain will be the rip-off payday lenders like Wonga who must be licking their lips because theirs will be the only loans that many unemployed people will be able to get."
Mr Meacher said the "wider significance" of this latest move is that it "cuts another big hole in the welfare security net to which we all contribute".
"The TUC is leading the campaign to 'Stop the Five Week Wait', and this should play a lead role in campaigning before the election."
In a statement, a DWP spokesman said: "Universal credit is a vital reform that will simplify the benefits system and make work pay.
"The seven day waiting period for benefits is not limited to universal credit but will apply to out-of-work benefits under the current system too. People can apply for an advanced benefit payment if needed.
"Paying benefits monthly is an important part of universal credit because it replicates the world of work and makes the transition to employment much smoother. We have matched this with increased budgeting support."
"The seven day waiting period for benefits is not limited to universal credit but will apply to out-of-work benefits under the current system too. People can apply for an advanced benefit payment if needed.
"Paying benefits monthly is an important part of universal credit because it replicates the world of work and makes the transition to employment much smoother. We have matched this with increased budgeting support."
The DWP added: "Many people find a job quickly, and people who have recently become unemployed have money from their final pay packet to help make ends meet. We discuss budgeting support with all universal credit claimants and over three-quarters (78%) of claimants feel confident about their ability to budget with monthly payments."
Horror Brought To You By Israel,the USA and David Cameron.
My prime minister staunchly supports this horror.
My Politicians Are Hypocrites.
The usa and uk have wanted to arm the rebels in syria.
Public support was against them but they did it anyway.
Public support was against them but they did it anyway.
The usa and uk are re-arming israel to commit more war crimes against civilians.
Though public support is against them.
Though public support is against them.
Now the west are demanding russia stop arming the separatists in ukraine.
When did the west and my country's politicians become such hypocrites ?
UNRWA Christopher Gunness Weeps For The Children Of #Gaza
Whilst the USA rearm #Israel and the UK staunchly supports the killing of children.
#Kickoutthetories
Israel May Say Sorry For Bombing a School.
Israel has said that it will investigate the shelling of a school housing displaced civilians.
"We have a policy - we don't target civilians", said an israeli spokesperson.
16 people died in the school with many others injured.
"We don't want to hurt innocent Gaza civilians. That's not our desire,"
Chris Gunness, spokesman for the UN Relief and Works Agency (Unrwa) told the BBC that Israel had been told 17 times that the school was housing displaced people, saying the attack caused "universal shame".
The school was housing 3,000 refugees trying to escape the slaughter.
Israel has said it will apologise if it is proved they were responsible for the carnage.
Israel has said it will apologise if it is proved they were responsible for the carnage.
Thats all right then
Wednesday, July 30, 2014
First They Came For The Bloggers...
Essex police arrested blogger chris spivey at his home early this morning.
Little information has been forthcoming from the police but the charge on the warrant was for Harassment under section 32.
Now my understanding of the law is that harassment is a CIVIL offence.
The powers that be must be becoming very nervous indeed.
The powers that be must be becoming very nervous indeed.
Prohibition of harassment.
(1)A person must not pursue a course of conduct—
(a)which amounts to harassment of another, and
(b)which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.
(2)For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it amounts to harassment of another if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct amounted to harassment of the other.
(3)Subsection (1) does not apply to a course of conduct if the person who pursued it shows—
(a)that it was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime,
(b)that it was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment, or
(c)that in the particular circumstances the pursuit of the course of conduct was reasonable.
Offence of harassment.
Offence of harassment.
(1)A person who pursues a course of conduct in breach of section 1 is guilty of an offence.
(2)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or both.
Civil remedy.
(1)An actual or apprehended breach of section 1 may be the subject of a claim in civil proceedings by the person who is or may be the victim of the course of conduct in question.
(2)On such a claim, damages may be awarded for (among other things) any anxiety caused by the harassment and any financial loss resulting from the harassment.
(3)Where—
(a)in such proceedings the High Court or a county court grants an injunction for the purpose of restraining the defendant from pursuing any conduct which amounts to harassment, and
(b)the plaintiff considers that the defendant has done anything which he is prohibited from doing by the injunction,
the plaintiff may apply for the issue of a warrant for the arrest of the defendant.
(4)An application under subsection (3) may be made—
(a)where the injunction was granted by the High Court, to a judge of that court, and
(b)where the injunction was granted by a county court, to a judge or district judge of that or any other county court.
(5)The judge or district judge to whom an application under subsection (3) is made may only issue a warrant if—
(a)the application is substantiated on oath, and
(b)the judge or district judge has reasonable grounds for believing that the defendant has done anything which he is prohibited from doing by the injunction.
(6)Where—
(a)the High Court or a county court grants an injunction for the purpose mentioned in subsection (3)(a), and
(b)without reasonable excuse the defendant does anything which he is prohibited from doing by the injunction,
he is guilty of an offence.
(7)Where a person is convicted of an offence under subsection (6) in respect of any conduct, that conduct is not punishable as a contempt of court.
(8)A person cannot be convicted of an offence under subsection (6) in respect of any conduct which has been punished as a contempt of court.
(9)A person guilty of an offence under subsection (6) is liable—
(a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or a fine, or both, or
(b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both.
Putting people in fear of violence.
(1)A person whose course of conduct causes another to fear, on at least two occasions, that violence will be used against him is guilty of an offence if he knows or ought to know that his course of conduct will cause the other so to fear on each of those occasions.
(2)For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it will cause another to fear that violence will be used against him on any occasion if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct would cause the other so to fear on that occasion.
(3)It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section to show that—
(a)his course of conduct was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime,
(b)his course of conduct was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment, or
(c)the pursuit of his course of conduct was reasonable for the protection of himself or another or for the protection of his or another’s property.
(4)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—
(a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or a fine, or both, or
(b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both.
(5)If on the trial on indictment of a person charged with an offence under this section the jury find him not guilty of the offence charged, they may find him guilty of an offence under section 2.
(6)The Crown Court has the same powers and duties in relation to a person who is by virtue of subsection (5) convicted before it of an offence under section 2 as a magistrates’ court would have on convicting him of the offence.
(2)For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it will cause another to fear that violence will be used against him on any occasion if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct would cause the other so to fear on that occasion.
(3)It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section to show that—
(a)his course of conduct was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime,
(b)his course of conduct was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment, or
(c)the pursuit of his course of conduct was reasonable for the protection of himself or another or for the protection of his or another’s property.
(4)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—
(a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or a fine, or both, or
(b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both.
(5)If on the trial on indictment of a person charged with an offence under this section the jury find him not guilty of the offence charged, they may find him guilty of an offence under section 2.
(6)The Crown Court has the same powers and duties in relation to a person who is by virtue of subsection (5) convicted before it of an offence under section 2 as a magistrates’ court would have on convicting him of the offence.
Keep your chin up, chris.
They will coming for the rest of us soon, im guessing.
They will coming for the rest of us soon, im guessing.
Onze Wereld: Ben van de brink - Chronologisch feitenoverzicht
Onze Wereld: Ben van de brink - Chronologisch feitenoverzicht: 1. 2009. Ben van den Brink ontdekt dat zijn 2 dochters Demi en Nirvana worden misbruikt en mishandeld door zijn schoonvader en zijn vriend...
#DirectAction And #CivilDisobedience
#DirectAction and #CivilDisobedience
My country is run by liars, fraudsters and abusers.
My police force is run by criminals.
The #JusticeSystem is #NotFitForPurpose
The Banks also run by #Criminals for #Criminals
The #Media no longer report #News just #AllOfTheAbove s views and interests.
What is one to do ?
My country is run by liars, fraudsters and abusers.
My police force is run by criminals.
The #JusticeSystem is #NotFitForPurpose
The Banks also run by #Criminals for #Criminals
The #Media no longer report #News just #AllOfTheAbove s views and interests.
What is one to do ?
Tuesday, July 29, 2014
Deputy Chief Constable - Ian Readhead - Doesnt Do Crime.
Deputy Chief Constable Ian Readhead ORDERING his officers NOT to investigate crime.
The lunatics have taken over the asylum.
#FFS
#FFS
#SackIanReadhead
Monday, July 28, 2014
Madeleine McCann Disappearence: SKY NEWS WAS INFORMED ABOUT MADELEINE'S DISAPPEARA...
Madeleine McCann Disappearence: SKY NEWS WAS INFORMED ABOUT MADELEINE'S DISAPPEARA...: British TV channel Sky News was informed about Madeleine McCann disappearance 30 minutes before Portuguese Police received a phone call, ac...
JUSTICE DENIED: Kincora, MI5, Gvt elite pedophiles and whistle-blo...
JUSTICE DENIED: Kincora, MI5, Gvt elite pedophiles and whistle-blo...: In Kincora Boys Home children were raped, exploited and murdered under the auspices of the UK Security Services MI5 and the UK Government. ...
#aVoice4all
#Help4TheVictims
#aVoice4all
#Help4TheVictims
Halifax - Kingston-Upon-Thames Branch.
I bank with the Halifax and have done for decades.
All banks are shit as we and the country have learned to our cost when they caused the 2008 crisis.
Have things changed ?
Have things changed ?
It appears not.
I cannot change my address easily without a 40 mile round trip.
I cannot even phone my branch - Halifax in Kingston Upon Thames for the information I need.
I cannot change my address easily without a 40 mile round trip.
I cannot even phone my branch - Halifax in Kingston Upon Thames for the information I need.
The first call to kingston gave me wrong information.
The second call put me through to a 'cant be arsed to help' young lady who disconnected my call.
The third call involved brian who was more informative and helpful.
The second call put me through to a 'cant be arsed to help' young lady who disconnected my call.
The third call involved brian who was more informative and helpful.
Sadly my business will still have to undergo a 40 mile round trip.
Just to change my address.
Just to change my address.
Halifax.
NOT here to help.
NOT here to help.
Saturday, July 26, 2014
#Whips Nonce Protecting Scum.
Government whips have a hard job protecting abusers and nonces in power.
That is their job.
#GovernmentWhips Nonce protecting scum.
Friday, July 25, 2014
Thursday, July 24, 2014
Tuesday, July 22, 2014
Children Are Dying. #Gaza
My prime minister supports israels right to 'defend itself'.
This child like all the other dead and wounded and traumatised children have no means of defence.
#Gaza
#StopTheViolence
#WarCrimes
#StopTheViolence
#WarCrimes
Monday, July 21, 2014
Sniper Shoots Unarmed Civilian. #Gaza
#Gaza
Shooting unarmed civilian while he was looking for his family.
#StopTheViolence
voiceforchildren: Jersey Child Abuse Committee of Inquiry A Fake, Pa...
voiceforchildren: Jersey Child Abuse Committee of Inquiry A Fake, Pa...: Former Jersey Politician, Deputy Daniel Wimberley has issued a Press Release (below) w...
#aVoice4all
#CSAinquiry
#aVoice4all
#CSAinquiry
Infiltrated: Mossad in Malaysia -- Puppet Masters -- Sott.net
Infiltrated: Mossad in Malaysia -- Puppet Masters -- Sott.net: http://www.sott.net/article/282329-Infiltrated-Mossad-in-Malaysia?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
Ten Days To See A Doctor.
Just listened in to my partners attempt at making an appointment to see her doctor.
Fully booked for ten days.
Is it any wonder more people are attending over-stretched Accident+Emergency departments ?
Where are the doctors ?
Where are the doctors ?
#KickOutTheTories
#ChangeTheSystem
#ChangeTheSystem
Sunday, July 20, 2014
#Amnesty For All #Whistleblowers
#Amnesty for all whistle blowers.
#Amnesty for victims of #ChildAbuse telling their stories.
#Amnesty for civil servants and police whistle blowers.
#Amnesty for NHS whistle blowers.
#Amnesty for civil servants and police whistle blowers.
#Amnesty for NHS whistle blowers.
#ReportCrime
#aVoice4all
#CSAinquiry
#aVoice4all
#CSAinquiry
#NameAndShame
#NameAndShame #EstablishmentAbusers There Is #NoJustice
Child Abuse survivors will NEVER have their day in court.
Establishment figures and politicians will NEVER be charged with abuse.
Government, Police and the Secret Services will NEVER give up the evidence.
The TRUTH will not OUT.
And there will never be healing or closure or justice for the victims of the sick bastards.
Unless they tell their stories NOW.
Give up the idea of justice through our legal system.
Mainstream media will not report the cases.
Social media is the only way.
#NameAndShame
Our system is riddled with corrupt perverts and criminals.
#NameAndShame NOW.
I support you as will the majority of society when the stories are OUT.
#paedobritain
#aVoice4all
#CSAinquiry
#Help4TheVictims
Establishment figures and politicians will NEVER be charged with abuse.
Government, Police and the Secret Services will NEVER give up the evidence.
The TRUTH will not OUT.
And there will never be healing or closure or justice for the victims of the sick bastards.
Unless they tell their stories NOW.
Give up the idea of justice through our legal system.
Mainstream media will not report the cases.
Social media is the only way.
#NameAndShame
Our system is riddled with corrupt perverts and criminals.
#NameAndShame NOW.
I support you as will the majority of society when the stories are OUT.
#paedobritain
#aVoice4all
#CSAinquiry
#Help4TheVictims
Ripped-off Britons: How the rich and their servants in government blam...
Ripped-off Britons: How the rich and their servants in government blam...: It is not just a recent event, but events over the centuries. Politicians are bought by people with money. This brilliant animated fairy t...
Saturday, July 19, 2014
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)