Thursday, August 17, 2017

Mr James and Cardiff Bay - the Western Mail reports.

Mark James' property dealings down in Cardiff Bay seem to have reached the ears of the Western Mail today, with an interesting article about residents' concerns over the management of their flats.


WalesOnline 14th August 2017

Blogger Jac o'the North recently went into a lot more detail in two posts, Baywatch 1 & 2, both of which I linked to here and urge you to read.

Mr James is a director of various Right To Manage (RTM) companies for Century Wharf flats and is also a director of a private company Building and Estate Solutions Today Ltd (BEST) set up in March 2017 with two business associates. All this information is freely available on Companies House website.

Aside from his burgeoning management empire, Mr James' property portfolio includes at least one flat in Century Wharf and two in another complex in Cardiff Bay, and he is also a registered landlord. (He also has a £250 per month hold over Caebrwyn's humble abode for his damages from his illegally funded counterclaim).

Amongst the issues some residents have with Mr James and the management of the Century Wharf complex is that flats are let for overnight stays, Airbnb, etc which is contrary to the terms of the leaseholds, as well as disturbing for the long term residents. I am also told that Mr James and his business associates seems to have 'taken over' the RTM Board and there is some speculation that the new company, BEST, may be seeking to contract maintenance and management work for themselves, and expand their interests elsewhere, not just Century Wharf.

The other issue is the appointment as a manager in the complex of a young lady, a former tenant of one of Mr James' flats, who, according to sources, has little or no experience in the field of property management and was introduced to the post by Mr James himself...

Then there is the manner in which Mr James has dealt with criticism, and I am told that he runs things in the Bay in an extraordinarily similar fashion to the way he runs the council. Needless to say, this is not a good thing. There are claims to legal advice which are never disclosed, claims to ministerial 'contacts', and veiled legal threats to those who question his actions.
Having been involved in litigation with Mr James myself for a number of years I have absolutely no reason to doubt any of the claims and allegations I have heard, and I've heard quite a few.

His responses to residents, as reported in the Western Mail article are quite revealing. He dismisses their concerns over the short stay lets as having no evidential basis; stag parties and hen-dos are no more disturbing that long term lets..says he, from the comfort, and quiet, of his home in Carmarthen...

He then goes on to claim that there is not only a 'cancer' in the complex (presumably this is a charming reference to dissatisfied residents) but the young lady's appointment was all above board; having a personal knowledge of the 'candidate' was an advantage, apparently, and avoided all the fuss of advertising for the post...

I'm sure readers are getting the drift by now, and that Mr James has quite a time consuming 'hands-on' approach to his affairs in the Bay...

With that in mind, and let's not forget the many months spent chasing myself through the civil and criminal court, let alone his extensive involvement with the Swansea City Deal, isn't it time he was asked how he squeezes in his £170,000 a year role as chief executive of Carmarthenshire Council? And, for the avoidance of doubt, has anyone asked about any potential conflicts of interest yet?

And a final point, if Mr James is content to take public money to pursue his legal affairs, and use council facilities as if they were his own, who's to say he hasn't furthered his own business (or other) interests in exactly the same manner, and with exactly the same arrogance?

 http://carmarthenplanning.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/mr-james-and-cardiff-bay-western-mail.html

Wednesday, August 09, 2017

Carmarthenshire Planning Problems and more: Freedom of Information - the difference a Review can make...

 Freedom of Information responses from Carmarthenshire Council can be a mixed bag.

Sometimes they try to baffle you with b******t, (appointment of
Monitoring Officer, Linda Rees Jones) and sometimes there are bizarre
refusals (top secret transfer of public toilets to community councils).



Occasionally, a few interesting beans are spilled, (the, er, 'car park
deal', released whilst the chief executive happened to be confined to
his potting shed courtesy of Gloucestershire police) whilst sometimes
they're met with hellfire, brimstone, and raging defensiveness (asking
for correspondence between County Hall and an evangelical church).



My latest FOI request concerned the Wellness Village thingy at Delta
Lakes, Llanelli. More specifically, how much the council has spent on
the project so far.



My request was clear and asked for information from 2013 to date. I also
asked for the cost of any 'works' to be detailed in the response.



The response duly arrived, scant in detail (a hallmark of the whole
project so far) but, aside from the match funding from other partners,
the figure for the council itself was £32,597.50.



Unfortunately the information only went back to 2016, not 2013 as I'd
requested, and didn't include any of the 'works' such as preparing and
raising the site so the whole thing doesn't get washed away. It's not
called Delta Lakes for nothing.



Given the omissions I asked the council to review their response, the
outcome of which arrived yesterday with a new figure, slightly erm,
higher than the first at £564,427.72...



At some point soon the council might even get round to submitting the planning application, which in itself has cost £34,000...



The full thread of the FOI request, and responses, can be seen here. There
will be more on the Wellness venture in due course, and I've also asked
Welsh Government for some figures, but this is an illustration of how,
when a council doesn't routinely publish spending details, and has a
culture of defensiveness; scrutiny and monitoring can be problematic.



Whilst I'm on the subject, the Freedom of Information (Extension) Bill
is slowly wending its way through parliament and, as the title suggests,
hopes to extend the reach of the FOI Act. The Statement of Purpose (in
full here) sums up the aims;



'The Freedom of Information (Extension) Bill will seek to make housing associations, local
safeguarding children boards, Electoral Registration Officers, Returning Officers and the Housing
Ombudsman public authorities for the purpose of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, whilst
making information held by persons contracting with public authorities subject to the Freedom of
Information Act 2000...'




All very welcome and interestingly it includes Returning Officers. A
request I made some years ago concerning fees paid to our Returning
Officer/chief executive was considered by Mr James to be an outrageous
invasion of his personal space...I might as well have been asking for
his bank details and PIN number.



(all previous FOI requests mentioned in this post can be found by searching this blog, they're there somewhere!)



Carmarthenshire Planning Problems and more: Freedom of Information - the difference a Review can make...