What Science Says About the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7 -
This chapter provides an overview of the analyses that NIST performed
to support its hypothesis of fire-induced failure. The areas that will be
examined include NIST’s analysis of “hypothetical blast scenarios” in
WTC 7 and the possible use of thermite, NIST’s estimates of fireproofing
dislodgement in WTC 1 and WTC 2, NIST’s testing of the steel temperatures,
and NIST’s computer modeling.
In the last three chapters, we examined the evidence
regarding the structural behavior of WTC 1, WTC 2,
and WTC 7 during their destruction, as well as evi-
dence showing the occurrence of high-temperature
thermitic reactions. We found consistently that NIST
either denied the evidence, ignored it, or provided
speculative explanations not based upon scientific
analysis. By contrast, the hypothesis of controlled
demolition readily, simply, and completely explained
all of the evidence examined.
In this final chapter, we will turn to evaluating the
analyses that NIST performed to support its hypoth-
esis of fire-induced failure. To guide our evaluation
of NIST’s analyses, we will bring back the scientific...
More -
https://www.ae911truth.org/images/BeyondMisinfo/Beyond-Misinformation-2015.pdf
