Sunday, July 30, 2017

Carmarthen - Planning Benefits....who.: Intimidation becomes worse.

Planning Benefits....who.: June 05 .................... Intimidation becomes ...:



 June 05 .................... Intimidation becomes more threatening.......

 


The intimidation was getting worse and
taking on a physical side. We were now constantly being waylaid as we
went out and came back home.  Friends visiting were also subjected to
the Thomases unwelcome presence as they had to stop to open the gate. 
Karen Thomas was spending a lot of time in the right of way area and was
now constantly either filming us or taking pictures over our gate. She
was also videoing anyone arriving to visit as they drove down the right
of way.   Our local farmer had been threatened.  He had been told not to
cut our fields and three of his tyres on his land rover had been cut.








Due to the local police not giving us any
support we had turned to the media.  We had also made contact with an
ex police officer for guidance and advice.








July 05



Our friendly farmer had come again to turn
the hay.  He stayed and had a cup of tea with me, and  asked if I would
open the gate the Thomases had erected at the top of our right of way
as the lane  was now too narrow for him to get out of his tractor.  I
had gone ahead of him and opened the gate.  As he drove out Karen Thomas
was waiting for him in order to take pictures of him.










I began walking back down the right of way
when I was aware Karen Thomas was following down behind me.  I then
felt a huge push into my shoulder which knocked me into the metal crash
barriers.  As I recovered she was standing in front of me blocking my
way.  Her very threatening body language, hands on hips, was shocking. 
She refused to move out of my way. When I asked her to move out of my
way and never to do that to me again her response was "what are you
going to do about it".  I naturally felt very threatened and scared by
her as there was no-one else around  - I was totally alone again, and I
knew the police would say there were no witnesses.  I was awaiting a hip
operation at the time and this was appalling behaviour to be assaulted
in this way, and clearly the nature of the intimidation had taken on a
different tone.  She warned me to stay out of her business, then stepped
aside and allowed me to walk down to my gate.  I reported this to the
police but as I expected I was told 'it's your word against hers'.  
Again, if the police had asked to view her CCTV cameras they would have
seen exactly what had occurred, but they declined my suggestion.




Eddie was constantly being confronted in
the right of way as he left for work, as he stopped to open the top gate
- a gate which had been installed to make life difficult for us.  One
particular morning as Eddie was walking back to his car after opening
the gate to drive out, the neighbour was as usual in the right of way
and deliberately barged into him knocking him into his car.  This
behaviour was completely alien to us.  As we didn't have any security,
but did have a camcorder, I took to filming Eddie driving out each
morning.  In the evening, he would stop and telephone me when he was
close to home, and again I would film him driving back in. What had our
lives become?   This camera was thus far our only witness, but would
hopefully deter the neighbours from these physical threats in our right
of way.  We had no other way out of our property and this couldn't go
on.






Wherever
we were on our property the neighbours would make their presence felt. 
Whether we were working in our garden - tending to our horse - mucking
out stables  - playing with our four dogs etc. we would be whistled at
or called out to.  Karen Thomas would frequently be leaning over our
gate, watching us over the boundary hedges, or sitting on the bank
behind their newly erected shed.  We were followed around wherever we
went.  I was feeling a prisoner in my own home as I was becoming more
nervous and anxious whenever I had to go outside.  I wasn't enjoying the
garden any more nor was I wanting to go down to the stables. Our lives
were no longer pleasurable.

Beer bottles and beer cans were now
appearing on our fields along with old knuckle bones.  Sheep skulls were
hung on branches of trees around our boundary.  We felt impotent and at
our neighbours mercy. I had begun to believe there was some other
reason the police were not giving us any support.  Having made contact
with a barrister and a race relations director in Cardiff they both
confirmed the police should have been doing more to help us, especially
as there was a history of aggressive and threatening behaviour towards
others before us.   We were becoming desperate for help.

Andrew
Thomas had taken to tailgating us as we drove out, and on this day drove
his HGV within feet of our small car.  I was terrified.  We felt
compelled to drive faster and faster to get away from him.  It was the
wrong thing to do but when feeling under such threat knowing we had no
support from anyone, flight instinct takes over.  The first chance we
had, we swerved off the road, at speed, and let him drive past us.   His
conduct was menacing, and of course again, we reported it to the
police.  The police said they were logging these incidents but no action
as yet could be taken because it was our word against theirs.  This was
the theme.  When we spoke to our kindly ex police officer over these
matters he was adamant that this was wrong.  He said the police do not
require witnesses when there is a clear pattern of behaviour and should
have been at the very least warning the neighbours.   I had always
believed the police protected people against this kind of dangerous
behaviour, but in our case they weren't.  The feeling of isolation just
kept growing.

Our lives were a total misery and we were suffering
in the same way as the two families before us had suffered.  Not only
were we now abused on a regular basis but we were still having to
contend with the noise from industrial machinery, maintenance on HGVs,
horrendous noise from the constant quarrying and the many other
disturbances to our quality of life.  It was obvious that Blaenpant was
being developed for an ever expanding industrial business - with zero
planning permissions and we were suffering the consequences of it.  


We had by now logged a long list of
incidents with the police but still no intervention nor help from them,
even though they were aware of the nature of the neighbours and their
intimidation and threats to others.   Carmarthen Council were continuing
to deny the existence of the obvious haulage business and the many
other industrial operations from a site within meters of our home, even
though there was an abundance of evidence to warrant enforcement and
most certainly applications for change of use to industrial.  It
appeared that the neighbours had the support of all local authorities
and we had none.  It certainly felt that way and was a very lonely place
to be in.   Our plans had to be put on hold and our future was
exceedingly bleak. We had no chance of getting away from this nightmare
situation.



July 05
 


It was a Sunday and I had driven to the
post box which was about a quarter of a mile away to post letters.  As I
was returning the neighbours drove past me in the opposite direction.
Karen Thomas gesticulated at me from the passenger seat, but I was
relieved at least I didn't have to contend with name calling as I
entered my home.  I had no longer opened the gate at the top of our
right of way, than the neighbours were driving back down towards me. 
They had followed me back home.  I was taunted and then assaulted for a
second time.  Statements were taken and eventually I was the one
arrested and charged with assault.  Yet again the police chose not to
view the Thomases CCTV which would have shown the entire incident and
shown Karen Thomas assaulting me.  This was seriously wrong, and only
added to my belief that the police were acting against us and were for
some reason reluctant to take any form of action against our
neighbours.  This became the scariest time of my life.   Carmarthen
Council were doubtlessly responsible for the nightmare that was now our
life. Due to their unwillingness to follow correct planning procedures
which was allowing an industrial business to flourish unimpeded, and
their denial to everyone who asked questions, that there was no such
business operating, they were encouraging aggressive and threatening
behaviour towards anyone who was aggrieved by it.  The violent nature of
the neighbours towards us should have caused concern to the Chief
Executive of this authority.  The TV documentary alone should have seen
the end of our nightmare as the truth was shown.   The question still
remains today - what was - and still is, the relationship between
someone employed by Carmarthen Council and these people, that has caused
so many people to have suffered at their hands.

It was
imperative now that we install some sort of camera at the top of our
driveway as witness to the shocking behaviour of the Thomases, ignored
by both the local police and Carmarthen Council. 

Due to my
continued complaints to Carmarthen Council about the disturbance to our
lives caused by this industrial site I was advised to write to the
Ombudsman. I wrote to the Ombudsman but it is no easy task to put
together a complaint to the PSOW.  I believed it was enough to simply
outline a general complaint.  It is not, and due to my naivety in not
putting together enough information, my complaint wasn't investigated. 
This is somewhat different to a complaint being investigated and not
upheld.  However it is usual it seems that Carmarthen Council play on
the fact that a complaint not being investigated somehow exonerates them
from any wrongdoing and use it as a weapon against you for ever more
when putting in further complaints to them.  The Ombudsman has recently
said "the fact a complaint has not been investigated does not mean
you didn't have a justified complaint, it just means it didn't warrant
resources being spent".
  Carmarthen Council need to understand that.

The
neighbours had by now received a letter from the council advising them
to remove the huge blue lorry away from our cottage, but a few weeks
later after the Thomases had refused to move it, the Council took the
view this was an agricultural storage unit for a few bales of hay.  It
seemed irrelevant that they had just built a huge shed which now towered
over us, for the storage of hay.










End of July......We
were awoken this sunny morning to the noise from a JCB within inches of
our bedroom window.  Our small cottage vibrated from this industrial
monster of a machine.  It was removing all of the grass around the area
we looked out onto.  We were fearful of what was coming next!   Metal
fencing panels arrived a few days later together with an old container
and another smaller structure that appeared to be the rear of a small
pick-up.  We were left with a sinking sickening feeling.  The neighbours
had more plans for us.  Something was going to arrive - but what?   How
do you describe the worry and the feeling of being constantly under
threat with no-one to help or care?   Bullying of any kind should not be
acceptable to either the police nor the local authority, but when it is
directly related to the council's negligence, it becomes somewhat
sinister.













 

















August 05

 

Another week went by and still nothing had
appeared under our windows.  We had been shopping, and as always we had
a feeling of foreboding upon our return, as we never knew what we were
going to be facing.  We were now to discover what the removal of grass -
the metal fencing panels - the rusty old container was for.  We were
now sleeping within feet of a couple of piglets.  I was also soon to
discover the names Karen Thomas had chosen for them....

Wednesday, July 26, 2017

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Carmarthenshire Planning Problems and more: CPS decision - Y Cneifiwr's analysis. And a complaint to the Wales Audit Office.









* * *


Further to ''Evidence' accessed from council computer - the Carmarthenshire Herald' I
have now asked the Wales Audit Office to look into the matter. The
email below was sent this morning and also copied to Adam Price AM and
council leader Emlyn Dole.

I have had an acknowledgement from the WAO, so when, or if, there is a substantive response, I will post it on this blog.



To; Wales Audit Office 
Dear Sirs, 
I wish to make a formal complaint concerning the chief executive of
Carmarthenshire County Council, Mr Mark James, relating to the use of
public resources to support a private legal case. 
Mr James made a complaint against me for criminal harassment to Dyfed
Powys Police in April 2016. This related solely to a blog of which I am
the author [http://carmarthenplanning.blogspot.co.uk/], and was in a
private capacity, a position confirmed by the Council press office
itself on 12th July 2017 to BBC Wales
[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-west-wales-40583933]. 
I am in possession of police reports (attached) which state that the
police visited County Hall, Carmarthen on the 18th April 2016 to take Mr
James' initial formal complaint. The same day there was an extensive
search of my blog from a council IP address. At the time, as this was a
very unusual search, I saved the log. I have attached a printed version
for your information. 
I believe that the contents of my blog was either saved or printed, by
persons unknown on a council computer to support Mr James' private legal
action and to supply information to the police for their criminal
investigation. 
On the 20/21st June 2016 there was another similar unusual search of my
blog from a council IP address, this was a few days prior to the police
again attending County Hall to take Mr James' full statement on the 27th
June. This date is corroborated in another police report. Again I
believe this search was undertaken to provide support for this private
criminal complaint. I attach to this email the saved log from this
search, as a file.
Searches similar to these have been carried out before that date and
since, most notably around the time a renewed complaint of harassment
made by Mr James on the 15th December 2016 and a day or two prior to a
County Court hearing held on 23rd March 2017 where Mr James was
enforcing damages personally awarded to him from an earlier court case.
My blog was again used in evidence at that hearing.

I did not save the logs relating to these two instances but I understand
that this information could be retrieved from the council, by
yourselves, if you decide to investigate the matter. 
The criminal charge of harassment against me was dropped by the Crown Prosecution Service on the 10th July 2017. 
I would be very grateful if you could investigate this matter. It is
highly inappropriate for the highest ranking officer in a public
authority to instruct another officer to provide information, via the
council IT infrastructure, for a private legal case, not only is it
unethical but it is also an improper use of council time and resources. 
In addition, it is of paramount importance for the administration of
justice, and the right to a fair trial, that the parties are on an equal
footing in terms of representation and resources. For the chief
executive to have access, and to use, public resources in this way is a
breach of both the conduct expected of him as well as the basic tenet of
our justice system, placing myself at a distinct disadvantage. 
With respect, I look forward to your confirmation that you will be
investigating this matter, and I would also be grateful for a brief
acknowledgement of this correspondence and the attached evidence. 
If you require any further information please contact me via this email address, or by post. 
Yours sincerely

Mrs Jacqui Thompson 
10 Attachments;

Blog stats for the 18th April 2016 (6 pages)

Blog stats for 20/21st June 2016 (one file)

Police crime report for 18th April 2016

Police report (following my complaints to Dyfed Powys Police); Relevant dates confirmed on Page 5




Carmarthenshire Planning Problems and more: CPS decision - Y Cneifiwr's analysis. And a complaint to the Wales Audit Office.

Wednesday, July 12, 2017

PMQs 12th july 17

Marian Parry Hughes Responds To The AM - Finally.

The Assembly Member for Arfon, Sian Gwenllian, emailed me on the 5th July and sent me a copy of the long overdue response from Marian Parry Hughes, Head of Children and Families at Gwynedd Council.

See my post of the 4th July for more detail -

 https://gwyneddsfailingcouncil.blogspot.co.uk/2017/07/arfon-am-ignored-by-gwynedd-head-of.html 


Mrs Hughes begins by apologising for not responding to the AM and states  -
"It certainly wasn't deliberate on my part."

So what was the reason for ignoring the AM for three months then ?
Mrs Hughes goes on to explain that Sharron Carter, Senior Operational Manager, had responded to the solicitor by letter and answered all relevant questions - in March.

The solicitor - after searching their files - state they have not received a letter from Sharron Williams Carter, from the date in question.
And if they had I would not have asked the AM - in April - for help in getting a response now - would I ?
I include a link to my post where Cyngor Gwynedd lost another important letter - one that had been placed in their secure letterbox in the Caernarfon office addressed to Aled Gibbard.

https://gwyneddsfailingcouncil.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/gwynedd-councils-secure-letterbox-not.html
How many letters do Gwynedd Council lose every year ? 
 
Sian, I am very grateful for your help in eliciting a response, finally, from the Department Head.

I am also very concerned that you were ignored by a council employee for three months.

Thursday, July 06, 2017

Gwynedd Council Personal Information Breach.

Preparing  paperwork for the meeting with the independent invesigators dealing with my stage 2 complaint against Gwynedd council, I was astonished by the council's use of a black marker to censor comments made by managers to other agencies involved with the family.
The investigators were more shocked than I and told me there was no need or reason for council staff to censor and it should not have happened.
Then I discovered Gwynedd council had also sent me the personal information of another person.
Oh dear.

Thursday, June 29, 2017

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

pmqs 28th june 17

Cyngor Gwynedd, A Missing Letter And An MP.

And a quick recap....

A stage 2 complaint from 2010 showing serious failings in the Children and Family Department at Cyngor Gwynedd was upheld by Independent Investigators.

From 2014, meetings and decisions made concerning a child's future were being held behind closed doors by managers and a social worker without the knowledge of the parents or professionals involved in the case. 
Worse was the fact that a social worker and other professionals were being ignored....as they raised concerns the child's needs were not being met.

A social worker who acted without thought for the code of ethics that he has agreed to uphold.
Or worse - a social worker who has been instructed by managers to behave so....inappropriately and against the interests of a vulnerable child - the client.
The jury is still out.

A failure of the children and families department to deliver the services granted by Gwynedd social services and when they finally appeared - after having their arm twisted by a solicitor - were shockingly bad.

So bad that a complaint was raised and which Aled Gibbard closed  - against statutory policy - and also without informing anyone !?!?

Kenealy Jones - you said a search was made for the letter to Mr Gibbard he claims he never received. Did you look in the bins ?

I have sighted your email to your colleague, Aled, voicing your concern about where this case could go.

The service(!) provided involved the support worker - yes him of the grunts and no feedback - leaving the client alone in a car when he attended to his own bits and pieces.
You did read the risk assessment, Iolo - yes ?
Is it council policy to leave vulnerable clients alone when in their care ?

All of this even before I asked the #Plaid_Cymru MP, Liz Saville Roberts for support.
Liz, who shook my hand, looked me in the eye and said "vote for me... and contact me if you ever need help".

MP's tut - some of them will say anything to get your vote.

Thursday, June 22, 2017

Director of children’s services at Bury council faces sack for serious misconduct.


The director of children’s services at Bury council is facing the sack for serious misconduct.

Mark Carriline, who earns £110,000 a year, appeared before a disciplinary hearing this week after he and council chief executive, Mike Owen, were found to have ‘deliberately’ delayed carrying out child protection procedures when a councillor was accused of indecent child image offences.

As revealed by the M.E.N, Mr Owen quit on Sunday - the day before he was due to face his disciplinary hearing.

A panel has concluded Mr Carriline was guilty of serious misconduct and has recommended he be dismissed without notice. It is now up to the council to ratify the recommendation.

Mr Owen and Mr Carriline were suspended in February with monitoring officer Jayne Hammond.

Ms Hammond was suspended due to concerns over legal advice she had given regarding the matter. She has been given a written warning.
Mike Owen has resigned from his position as chief executive at Bury Council
But the panel concluded Mrs Hammond did not have direct responsibility for child safeguarding, and an independent report did not find that her legal advice had been wrong, and there was no evidence of ulterior motive at work but there 'were lessons to be learned'.

Mr Owen, who was paid £157,000 a year will not receive any severance package, just holiday money due.
A review this year found Mr Owen and Mr Carriline had ‘inexplicably’ and ‘deliberately’ delayed implementing safeguard procedures when allegations about former Labour councillor Simon Carter first came to light.
 
The then councillor for Tottington, who was on the adoption register at the time, had been accused of making indecent child images in spring 2015 and was convicted the following September.

An investigation found Mr Owen and Mr Carriline had waited up to five weeks to carry out a string of child protection measures that should have been implemented within 24 or 48 hours of the allegations surfacing.

That included taking eight days to inform the school where he was a governor.

Carter was immediately removed from the council’s list of people approved to adopt children, but a report found child protection measures weren’t put in place in the proper time frame.
Former Bury councillor Simon Carter admitted making indecent images of children
In June 2015, Carter admitted 16 counts of making indecent images of children at Bolton Crown Court.
The charges related to the downloading of images. There is no suggestion any children were harmed as a result of the safeguarding delays.

In a statement Bury council said: “A disciplinary panel of Bury Council met on 19 and 20 June to consider an independent external investigation report undertaken by Charles Bourne QC. The report examined disciplinary allegations which had been made against three senior officers of the council following a review into a historic child safeguarding issue.

“The panel noted the resignation with immediate effect of the chief executive and head of paid service, Mike Owen, which had been received on Friday, 16 June 2017 and was effective at midnight on 18 June 2017.

"The panel noted that the council had no choice in whether to accept the resignation as it was a unilateral action on the part of Mr Owen. The panel noted with concern the findings of the Independent Investigation reports regarding Mr Owen’s role in the historic child safeguarding issue under review, but noted that as Mr Owen was no longer an employee of the council it had no jurisdiction to reach any conclusions on the matter.
“In respect of a second senior officer, the panel considered the Independent Investigation Report and heard representations from witnesses and the officer and his representative. The panel considered the recommendations of the report and concluded that the officer was guilty of serious misconduct, further, the officer had failed to maintain trust and confidence of the council and accordingly the panel recommends to the full council that the officer is dismissed from the service without notice.

“Having carefully considered the Independent Report, the evidence and the representations of a third senior officer, Jayne Hammond, the allegations against that officer were resolved by the panel.
"Whilst there were lessons to be learned, Mrs Hammond did not have direct responsibility for child safeguarding, the Independent report did not find that Mrs Hammond’s legal advice had been wrong, and there was no evidence of ulterior motive at work.”

 http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/director-childrens-services-bury-council-13218079#ICID=sharebar_facebook

Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Lewisham Council Obstruction of FOI Request.

The FOI request was simple, and it was made on 6 Jun 2016.

Over a year later Lewisham Council have failed to comply with their duty under the FOI Act to supply the information requested.

They have offered a number of exemptions, excuses, numerous broken deadlines, even given unlawful excuses not covered under the FOI Act, and delayed and delayed and delayed and failed to reply a number of times.

Eventually after 8 months I was forced to make a complaint to the Monitoring Officer.  The Monitoring Officer has the specific duty to ensure the county council, its officers, and its elected councillors, maintain the highest standards in all they do [11]

However this monitoring officer failed to do her job, she failed to do her duty, she failed to answer nearly every question I asked her, she even went on holiday when she said she would reply. She failed to ensure the Council answer as required to do so by the FOI Act. She has failed to ensure an internal review of the FOI is carried out as required to do.

Unfortunately regulators such as ICO are slow to act and rogue Councils know this and take advantage of it to delay. I have started upon that route, but that is likely to take another two years and there are many steps on that route and the ICO itself claims to be short of staff and is already slow completing the very first step.

One course accessible to me and one of the most powerful is to name and shame.
  • Kath Nicholson is the monitoring officer. It is her duty to ensure the Council maintain the highest standards in all they do.
  • It is Kath Nicholson who has failed to do her duty as monitoring officer to ensure the Council maintain high standards and reply substantively within a year to a FOI request with the information.
  • It is Kath Nicholson who has failed to even maintain a legal standard, never mind maintain the highest standards for herself and nor ensuring the council’s officers maintain highest standards
  • Kath Nicholson it seems has set a slovenly, illegal standard and been as awkward as possible.
  • Kath Nicholson even actively refused to send the reply to one part of the FOI to the public WDTK website, she maintains she will only send it my personal email, which was given to her in the process of making the complaint and not anything to do with the FOI itself.
The highest standard Kath or the lowest?
                                                                    Kath Nicholson
Kath Nicholson, supposed Monitoring Officer, refuses to answer how Lewisham’s records are filed.

Kath Nicholson, supposed Monitoring Officer, refuses to say whether there is a digitised index.

Kath Nicholson, supposed Monitoring Officer refuses to say whether the records are stored in house or via an external agency where a fee has to be paid.

Kath Nicholson, supposed Monitoring Officer, refuses to explain what was meant by an odd phrase “to retrieve this information would require manual checks on all such individuals”

Kath Nicholson, supposed Monitoring Officer, refuses to do an internal review on the council claim that the 160 page “After Leeways” Report cannot be found in 18 hours despite the fact it is the duty of the Council to do.

Kath Nicholson, supposed Monitoring Officer, refuses to do an internal review on the council claim that they cannot find a Review of the Child Services from 1990 within 18 hours despite the fact it is the duty of the Council to do so.

Kath Nicholson, supposed Monitoring Officer, illegally refuses to send a copy of the Chief Executives report to the WDTK website. This was the same report that the Council unlawfully claimed was Confidential and would not be released. they clearly do not want it available to the public.

Kath Nicholson, supposed Monitoring Officer, refuses to say whether the Elizabeth Lawson “1 year on Report” was not done or it was done but lost, and refuses to do an internal review into this.

Kath Nicholson, supposed Monitoring Officer, refuses to confirm what documents they hold.

Kath Nicholson, supposed Monitoring Officer refuses to answer what the legal reason was to refuse the “Chief Executives Report” or admit that there were no legitimate reasons for refusal.

Kath Nicholson, supposed Monitoring Officer refuses to process a formal complaint about the staff involved in the delay of the FOI request and the failure of the Council to answer my requests for internal reviews and further information.

Kath Nicholson, supposed Monitoring Officer, refuses to internally review the whole request some 5 months after it was requested. It appears as though staff have been told not even to acknowledge my correspondence on this request.

*By “refuses” I mean she has not done so after repeated requests, and therefore this is a de facto refusal.

I have good reason to believe that there was widespread child sexual abuse in Lewisham Council, that was covered up at the time.

The actions of Lewisham Council and Kath Nicholson in particular are without doubt deliberately still delaying and covering up.

Perhaps Lewisham Council are using this time to find and shred or destroy or “lose” documents that will incriminate Lewisham Council. Perhaps they are taking steps to reduce their financial liability. That would explain why they feel they can deliberately and openly flout their public and legal duty yet are supposed to be public servants.

Have Kath Nicholson and Lewisham Council gone rogue? Are corporate interests a higher priority than public duty?

Is Kath Nicholson’s job as head of Law in conflict with her job as Monitoring Officer. Quite clearly she is not carrying out her duties properly as Monitoring Officer. Why? Does the Council support her refusal to carry out her legal duty?

Are the Council refusing to do their public duties and acting on some interpretation of their corporate ones?

Is the Council paying people to cover up child sexual abuse?

That is a reasonable explanation that fits the facts.

How sick are the people involved who actively or passively cover up the rape of children? What are their motives? What do they get in return?

A much abbreviated history of the  FOI correspondence with links follows, the full saga can be checked here [1]

2016 Jun 6 [1]

Please could you send me a copy of
1. The dossier “After Leeways, Challenges, Changes and Achievements” published by the London Borough of Lewisham on March 19th 1987
2. The minutes of the Social Services Committee 23rd July 1985
3. Review of Childrens Residential Services believed to be July 1984
4. Chief Executives Inquiry Report, subsequent to Leeways believed to be February 1986
5. Minutes of the Report to Council on 5 March 1986 (This should contain discussion of Chief Execs Inquiry Report)
6. Report of the Elizabeth Lawsons Independent Panel 1 year on from Leeways Report
2016 Sept 26 Answer (paraphrased)   [1a]

  1. “After Leeways, Challenges, Changes and Achievements”. Refused as it is not recorded in a readily accessible form, too much time and money Section 12(1)  [1a]
  2. Social Services Committee 23rd July 1985 Minutes provided see [1b]
  3. Review of Childrens Residential Services believed to be July 1984  – refused not recorded in a readily accessible form – too much time and money Section 12(1)
  4. Chief Executives Inquiry Report – Refused Confidential [No legal reason given]
  5. Minutes of the Report to Council on 5 March 1986 (This should contain
    discussion of Chief Execs Inquiry Report) There are no records of a meeting on the date you quote.
  6. Elizabeth Lawsons Independent Panel 1 year on from Leeways Report – Information not held
2016 Oct 1 [1c] My reply

1. “After Leeways, Challenges, Changes and Achievements” dossier is apparently approximately 160 pages and was the main Lewisham response to the Inquiry into the horrific situation of Lewisham Council having a child abuser in charge of its childrens home who had abused several children. It should from the size be relatively easy to find within your files.
To help me understand could you explain how are Lewishams records from this time filed or catalogued, whether there is a digitised index and also whether Lewishams records are stored in house or via an external agency where a fee has to be paid for searching?
I do not understand what you mean by “individuals” in this sentence “To retrieve this information would require manual checks on all such individuals. “ Could you explain?
2. Thankyou for those minutes
3. Review of child services not able to be found. This was a major revamp only 30 years ago. Is this not able to be found easily within the time limit?
4. “Chief Executives Inquiry Report, subsequent to Leeways believed to be February 1986 This information is deemed confidential, and will not be released”
Could you give the exemption Lewisham is claiming under the FOI Act? I also enclose a link to a document which gives some more detail as to the Report for your information.
5. Minutes of Report to Council 5 March 1986
This is link to a page 19 that has been supplied to me https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2016/10/0… I believe it to be from the “After Leeways Report” but I could be mistaken. It describes this Report to Council. I wonder whether it would be possible to find it with this help. Is it also possible to identify the other 3 monthly progress reports and the meetings that they were supplied to? I realise this maybe taken as a new request.
6. Report of the Elizabeth Lawsons Independent Panel 1 year on from Leeways Report. Did this Report happen or has it been lost?

2017 Jan 23 [1d] My Reply 

You replied to my request of 1 Oct 2016 “Thank you for your recent request. Your request is being considered and you will receive a response within the statutory timescale of 20 working days, subject to the application of any exemptions/exceptions”
I received a response to part of the request on 4 Oct, but a substantial part has not been replied to.
Nor have I received even a reply to my subsequent emails. If I do not receive a reply I will therefore be forced to put in a complaint against you.
Please tell me who the head of Freedom of Information Department is?
Please could you tell me who the Lewisham Council Monitoring Officer is presently?
Please could you tell me why I have not received a reply to my FOI of 1 Oct 2016 nor subsequent emails?
Please answer my requests as Lewisham Council is required to by law.
I gather that my next stage is to ask for an internal review. If I do not receive reply to my requests by 5pm on 25th Jan 2017, please take this a request for Internal Review [1d]
No further progress has been made on the FOI since Jan 23 despite several requests.

Summary of FOI

The Council
  • provided one set of minutes
  • refused two large reports that they claimed would take over 18  hours each to find
  • refused another report on “confidentiality”,  ie  grounds with no legality in FOI
  • maintained one meeting I requested a report for did not happen to which I gave them  information that it did, i heard nothing more
  • claimed not to hold another report
  • have refused to answer any questions or requests about this since
How would they know they did not hold one report yet they claim it would take them 18 hours to search for another?

Summary of Requests Outstanding

1 “After Leeways, Challenges, Changes and Achievements” dossier is apparently approximately 160 pages and was the main Lewisham response to the Inquiry into the horrific situation of Lewisham Council having a child abuser in charge of its childrens home who had abused several children. It should from the size be relatively easy to find within your files. To help me understand could you explain how are Lewishams records from this time filed or catalogued, whether there is a digitised index and also whether Lewishams records are stored in house or via an external agency where a fee has to be paid for searching?
I do not understand what you mean by “individuals” in this sentence “To retrieve this information would require manual checks on all such individuals. “ Could you explain?
2 Review of child services not able to be found. This was a major revamp only 30 years ago. Is this not able to be found easily within the time limit?
3 “Chief Executives Inquiry Report, subsequent to Leeways believed to be February 1986 This information is deemed confidential, and will not be released”
Could you give the exemption Lewisham is claiming under the FOI Act? I also enclose a link to a document which gives some more detail as to the Report for your information.
[Report still not been provided to this site as requested. Attachments been sent to private email, which I do not wish to open as they may be insecure, whereas on this site it is secure and public and where I requested it and where it is Lewisham’s duty to provide it.]
4 Minutes of Report to Council 5 March 1986
This is link to a page 19 that has been supplied to me https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2016/10/0… I believe it to be from the “After Leeways Report” but I could be mistaken. It describes this Report to Council. I wonder whether it would be possible to find it with this help. Is it also possible to identify the other 3 monthly progress reports and the meetings that they were supplied to? I realise this maybe taken as a new request.
5 Report of the Elizabeth Lawsons Independent Panel 1 year on from Leeways Report. Did this Report happen or has it been lost?
6. Internal review on why all information requested has not been provided or questions even addressed.

Kath Nicholson appears to be the central figure in Lewisham as to why the legitimate FOI request is not being processed lawfully or any information is being released nor given about any aspect of the request including an acknowledgment of questions referring to it [16]
It could be seen as worrying that Kath Nicholson has said –
“as local authority lawyers, we are working with politicians and so have to be politically astute, too. My job is to help them do what they want to do. In more than 30 years [in local government], I’ve only said “You can’t do that” once or twice.” [13]
It is also worrying that she admits that her department is not overseeing child protection cases safely –
“The department has 103 live child protection cases being handled by just eight solicitors. ‘An individual solicitor can safely handle between 10 and 12 cases, except my staff are doing adult protection work too,’ says Nicholson. ‘Cases can be hugely complicated, particularly where there are six or seven children in the family.’” [13]
Most worrying is that Kath Nicholson is not doing her job properly as Monitoring Officer, which has widespread repercussions throughout the Council and Lewisham.
The truth about what is child sexual abuse happened in Lewisham Councils “care” is not being revealed because she is not doing that job properly. Perhaps she is helping politicians do what they want rather than do what her Monitoring Officer job is? Perhaps there is a conflict between being Head of Law and Monitoring Officer?
Kath Nicholson, Lewisham Council – Shame on you
Please note that victims of abuse may be triggered by reading this information. These links are generally UK based.
  • The Sanctuary for the Abused [A] has advice on how to prevent triggers.
  • National Association for People Abused in Childhood [B] has a freephone helpline and has links to local support groups.
  • One in Four [C]
  • Havoca [D].
  • Useful post on Triggers [E]  from SurvivorsJustice [F] blog.
  • Jim Hoppers pages on Mindfulness [G]  and Meditation [H] may be useful.
  • Hwaairfan blog An Indigenous Australian Approach to Healing Trauma  [J]
  • Survivors UK for victims and survivors of male rape or the sexual abuse of men [K]
  • Voicing CSA group [L] helps arrange survivors meetings in your area
  • A Prescription for me blog Various emotional support links [M]
  • ShatterBoys -“Male Survivors Of Childhood Sexual Abuse Inspiring change, Through Shared Experience Whilst Building Connections…Together We Can Heal” [N]
Links
[1] 2016 Jun 6 WDTK FOI to Lewisham Council Leeways Childs Home, 17 Edward Rd, Bromley https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/leeways_childs_home_17_edward_rd#outgoing-549340

[1a] 2016 Sept 26 answer https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/leeways_childs_home_17_edward_rd#incoming-872834
[1b] 1985 Jul 23 Meeting of Social Services Committee 17 pages https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/338492/response/872834/attach/3/Leeways.pdf
[1c] 2016 Oct 1 Q https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/leeways_childs_home_17_edward_rd#outgoing-584348
[1d] 2017 Jan 23 Q https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/leeways_childs_home_17_edward_rd#outgoing-616147
[1e] 2017 Jun 1 Second request https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/leeways_childs_home_17_edward_rd#outgoing-654591
[2] 2016 Oct 1 Cathy Fox Blog  Lewisham Council Chief Executives Inquiry Leeways Childrens Home https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2016/10/01/lewisham-council-chief-executives-inquiry-leeways-childrens-home/
[3] 2014 Nov 24 cathy fox blog Lewisham Leeways Report and Social Services Minutes July 1985 https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2014/11/24/lewisham-leeways-report-and-social-services-minutes-july-1985/
[4] 2014 Jan 21 cathy fox blog Council Response to Leeways Report https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2014/01/21/council-response-to-leeways-report/
[5] 2013 Nov 12 cathy fox blog The Leeways Inquiry Report into Sexual Abuse https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2013/11/12/the-leeways-inquiry-report-into-sexual-abuse/
[6] 2016 Jan 24 cathy fox blog Paedophilia around Piccadilly Part 5 1980s and Operation Circus https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2016/01/24/paedophilia-around-piccadilly-part-5-1980s-and-operation-circus/
[7] 2014 Sept 16 Cathy Fox Blog Paedophilia around Piccadilly Part 3 -Timeline of a Child Rapist 2 – Roger Gleaves https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2014/09/16/paedophilia-around-piccadilly-part-3-profile-of-a-paedophile-roger-gleaves/
[8] 2015 May 6 cathy fox blog Paedophilia around Piccadilly Part 4 Playland Trial and Cover up https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2015/05/06/paedophilia-around-piccadilly-part-4-playland-trial-and-cover-up/
[9] pic 2
[11] Local Government and Housing Act Section 5  http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/42/section/5
[12] Lewisham Senior Managers https://www.lewisham.gov.uk/mayorandcouncil/aboutthecouncil/how-council-is-run/council-structure/Pages/senior-managers.aspx
Kath Nicholson Head of Law Kath has overall responsibility for legal advice to and representation of the Council. It also includes the duties of the Council’s statutory monitoring officer and responsibility for the management of European and national parliamentary and local elections. She manages approximately 50 staff.
Kath is a solicitor with over 34 years’ experience in the public and private sector and holds an MBA in Public Sector Management.
[13] 2013 Oct 14 Law Gazette People Kath Nicholson https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/people/kath-nicholson/5038115.articlehttp://archive.is/HhG3L
leader of a team of 27 fee-earners dealing with child protection, governance, employment, property, litigation and all the other issues that a large inner-city local authority generates. She also found time to co-author a book, A Guide to the Local Government Act 1999, with Trowers & Hamlin partner Helen Randall.
‘As lawyers, we all have to be the goalkeeper who can also take penalties,’ Nicholson tells the Gazette. ‘We have to be proactive while getting the balance right – because nobody wants an overly conservative lawyer. The big difference is that as local authority lawyers, we are working with politicians and so have to be politically astute, too. My job is to help them do what they want to do. In more than 30 years [in local government], I’ve only said “You can’t do that” once or twice.
The pressure is certainly intense. The department has 103 live child protection cases being handled by just eight solicitors. ‘An individual solicitor can safely handle between 10 and 12 cases, except my staff are doing adult protection work too,’ says Nicholson. ‘Cases can be hugely complicated, particularly where there are six or seven children in the family.’
The problem is not confined to child protection, Nicholson adds. Lewisham’s education team is now down to one solicitor, yet more than 90 schools need legal advice on how to become academies. The employment team, moreover, comprises just two solicitors to handle the affairs of thousands of staff. Employment claims commonly arise from the downsizing policies of the council and have included a Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) case that went as far as the Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg and this country’s Supreme Court.
[14] Foulston http://archive.is/HKFoQ
[15] 1985 Dec 10 WDTK Special Meeting of Social Services Ctte Minutes  https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/184669/response/473239/attach/3/Leeways%20response%2010%2012%2085.pdf
[16] 2017 Jun 14 WDTK https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/leeways_childs_home_17_edward_rd#outgoing-658043

Sunday, June 18, 2017

Michael Rosen: A firefighter who attended Grenfell tower has writ...

Michael Rosen: A firefighter who attended Grenfell tower has writ...: [This piece of writing is up on the Facebook 'Save the Fire Service' page and begins with ' Sent to us at STUKFS, powerful and e...

Saturday, June 17, 2017

British Intelligence bought information about US Child Abusers.

Quality independent media site “Disobedient Media” has received information in response to their Freedom of Information request.

102 pages from the New York State Select Committee On Crime from 1982 have been released [2]

The evidence was given to the New York State Select Committee on Crime, its causes, control and effect on society, in the matter of  “A Public Hearing to consider the Boy Prostitution and Pornography”

Senators Ralph Marino, Abraham Bernstein, Howard Babbush, Owen Johnson, as well as Jeremiah McKenna and Lilli Scott were on the Committee.

Witnesses describe children, probably way in excess of 400, being trafficked round a circuit which encompassed Houston, Los Angeles, San Francisco, New Orleans, New York, D.C., and Florida, spending a few weeks in each location.

The circuit included bars, burlesque houses
, pornographic movie joints where abusers rang up between cities to arrange a child and paid by credit card. This was linked to organised crime or Mafia. One prominent figure mentioned  in connection with pornography was Michael Zaffarano.

Detectives from Washington DC, Carl Shoffler and Anne Fisher gave evidence and described the network. However the part I will concentrate on for this post is evidence given by Dale Smith. He was an investigator for the Select Committee on Crime and research analyst in 1978 and 1979 investigating juvenile prostitution and pornography in New York [p44]

Smith states that there were two 2 male “call service operations” in Washington, called Friendly Models and Stables. Call Service Operations is the euphemistic term they use to describe prostitution arranged over the phone. The prostitution of children was mixed in with this.

Stables was a male homosexual call service linked to another locally and two in New York. Arlington Police raided Friendly Models and obtained a warrant for the search and arrest of Stables operation [p56].

Robert Koehler was an accountant of several call service operations in Washington. Koehler said that details of sexual proclivities of abusers were sold to agents of foreign Intelligence [p58]
Johnathan Christopher Reynolds III, call service operator of Brians Boys and Fantasies Unlimited in Alexandria, Virginia. He admitted that information was sold to to British and Israeli Intelligence [p59]
 “A Public Hearing to consider the Boy Prostitution and Pornography” Report page 59

So British intelligence, presumably MI6, knew of the sexual abuse of children, of the prostitution of children and did nothing to help. In fact, the opposite. They took advantage of children’s suffering and bought information about the sexual habits of the abusers.

Of course that is exactly what their colleagues in the Security services do in the UK. They are steeped in this aberrant behaviour which they see as normal or convince themselves it is somehow in the national interest. Sickos.

They obtain the abusers information, not to bring them to justice, but to control, by blackmail, the child abusers who are often in powerful positions. Blackmail is just another crime to add to the intelligence services long list.

The children and people that the intelligence services are supposed to protect are the very people they abuse. The intelligence services, stuffed full of people with abnormal, psychopathic behaviours however are realistically immune from prosecution and the law due to inadequate safeguards over the behaviour of intelligence services.

If the security services are not actually running the child abuse networks, then they are neck deep in them.

It was noted in this US Report that the “law appears to have had little effect in controlling the traffic in child flesh”. The Justice system was not interested. That I would venture was because the judges are subjected to the same blackmail by the recidivist “intelligence” agencies.

This situation outlined in the report in 1980 has “developed” in the US until there is now a whole criminal swamp comprising the deep state, politicians and organised crime. They run ratlines of sex trafficking, child trafficking, legal drugs, illegal drugs, organ harvesting, money, weapons, oil, information and anything they can make a commodity. See #AwanBrothers

Democracy is an illusion.

The UK is not far behind. In UK Swamp plc are the deep state, intelligence agencies, banks especially HSBC,  police, judges, politicians. Symptoms are weapons sales to terrorists, prostitution and rape of children, corruption, two faced politicians who continue to harm the people they are supposed to represent.
The question is what are we going to do about it and when?

The full article from Disobedient media follows.
2017 Jun 16 Disobedient Media Disobedient Media Releases FOIA On East Coast Trafficking Networks [1] 
Disobedient Media today releases 102 pages from the New York State Select Committee On Crime. The document describes an investigation into child pornography and human trafficking by two detectives from the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Police. The findings were presented to officials on July 26, 1982.

Detectives found that organized crime did play a role in the distribution of child pornography, but that the day-to-day activity in regards to child prostitution appeared to be run by a group of collectors who would, “trade material and trade male prostitutes back and forth.” The investigation revealed that young male and female minors were being transported between California and D.C. along a route known as the “California Connection.” The route was part of a circuit which encompassed Houston, Los Angeles, San Francisco, New Orleans, New York, D.C., and Florida. According to detectives, clients could call a phone number in Houston from Washington and have a young boy delivered directly to their location. These purchases were incredibly streamlined and could even be made with credit cards which were charged to front companies under various guises such as photography studios, book stores, models, and model agencies.

Minors were also prostituted out of bars. In some cases, there would be as many as 50 to 75 minors at a single bar. Detectives found that minors were from different sections of the country and were generally runaways, some leaving from various organizations they had been placed into by the state. The investigation also noted that the younger children would be placed on narcotics in order to keep them under control, and were told not to talk to the police, and that if they did, they would receive bodily harm or be killed.

One of the key figures in the investigation was William Oates, who ran pornographic film and burlesque houses out of D.C., Pittsburgh, and New York which catered to male homosexual clientele and had live stage performances by dancers who doubled as prostitutes. Another subject of the investigation was Paul Abrams, who ran a call service out of New York, which included male prostitutes and children. Abrams was later arrested and pled guilty to prostitution, but received only probation for his involvement in the felony offense.

Detectives also stated that these call services would supplement their income by selling information on the sexual proclivities of their clients to agents of British, Israeli, and Soviet intelligence services. Intelligence agencies have a documented history of seeking sexual blackmail to exert control over public figures and government assets.

According to investigators, anti-human trafficking efforts were hampered by lack of funding and almost no support from the federal government. Additionally, trafficking victims would often be unwilling to return home and face judgmental scrutiny from their local communities.

The investigation’s content sheds new light on the nexus between human trafficking, organized crime and government agencies.

The document can be found in a searchable format here.
Please note that victims of abuse may be triggered by reading this information. These links are generally UK based.
  • The Sanctuary for the Abused [A] has advice on how to prevent triggers.
  • National Association for People Abused in Childhood [B] has a freephone helpline and has links to local support groups.
  • One in Four [C]
  • Havoca [D].
  • Useful post on Triggers [E]  from SurvivorsJustice [F] blog.
  • Jim Hoppers pages on Mindfulness [G]  and Meditation [H] may be useful.
  • Hwaairfan blog An Indigenous Australian Approach to Healing Trauma  [J]
  • Survivors UK for victims and survivors of male rape or the sexual abuse of men [K]
  • Voicing CSA group [L] helps arrange survivors meetings in your area
  • A Prescription for me blog Various emotional support links [M]
  • ShatterBoys -“Male Survivors Of Childhood Sexual Abuse Inspiring change, Through Shared Experience Whilst Building Connections…Together We Can Heal” [N]
Links
[1] 2017 Jun 16 Disobedient Media Disobedient Media Releases FOIA On East Coast Trafficking Networks http://disobedientmedia.com/2017/06/disobedient-media-releases-foia-on-east-coast-trafficking-networks/
[2] Disobedient Media FOI release  http://live.disobedientmedia.com/documents/ny-sex-trafficking.pdf
[3] http://thegoldwater.com/news/3842-Nationwide-Child-Sex-Trafficking-FOIA-Exposed
Other notes
Smith assisted NYPD in arrest of juvenile call service operator called Paul Abrams. He pleaded guilty to a felony charge of prostitution and received probation.
1982 updates bar on upper EastSide called Dallas 53rd St near 2nd Avenue, and Follies Theatre 48th West side near Minnesota Strip, live sex shows with underage kids
owner William Oates in Pittsburgh also had Best of Both Worlds

Friday, June 16, 2017

Tuesday, June 06, 2017

Gwynedd Council - The Problem Is Management.

So where were we ?
Ah yes - I cancelled the meeting with the social worker.
The partner had become ill with the stress and nastiness of it all and my daughter had just suffered a miscarriage - all this and dealing with the light and dark side of PDA - it was a relief to use the time to calm down and think...
The social worker turned up anyway.
Lowri Williams, customer care(!) wrote later "...the Service felt that cancelling the meeting was not appropriate,"
Mr Haydon also wrote a report to his managers describing the meeting with me.
Jamie, I have seen a copy of your report and I hardly recognise your version of events.
Will the report be updated to include how you foot shuffled and spent most of our exchange staring at the floor like a scoolboy , mumbling -
"You haven't made a complaint about me, have you ?"
Will you update the report to include the fact that your managers, Melvin Panther and Sharron Williams Carter sent you to my house knowing that I had raised issues with your bad behaviour and the meeting cancelled - without informing you ?
Do you think that is "appropriate" behaviour from your managers, Jamie ?
Jamie, in your report you call me 'agitated' when I answered the door - that was a mixture of horror and anger at your presence until I realised that you had been set up.
What manager would send an employee out to visit someone who was upset and not even advise them ?
Were they hoping for confrontation ?
http://www.communitycare.co.uk/2014/09/16/violence-social-workers-just-part-job-70-incidents-investigated/
Have you raised an issue with #Unison that your managers put you in an impossible situation with little regard for your safety ?
I remember saying to you "Jamie, contact your managers. Something weird is going on."
You whispered that you have to wait for them to get in touch.
#Shocking -  from you, Jamie, and your managers.
Cyngor Gwynedd have refused my right to make an official complaint about the incident.

More on Gwynedd Council here -  https://gwyneddsfailingcouncil.blogspot.co.uk/